Curiosity

"We shall not cease from exploration, and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time."

Curiosity is a virtue, and we should cultivate virtues. It's exciting that we live in an era when explanations for many of the most fundamental aspects of human existence are within reach. In particular, many age-old puzzles have been tackled using evolutionary arguments; for many more, we have tantalising hints and hypotheses but not full explanations. Below I've listed some questions in the latter category. Of course, a set of behaviours often has multiple advantages, and there may be no definitive way to weigh their relative contributions to its evolution. But I think it's likely that in many cases, compelling explanations will be found eventually; until then, it's worth reviewing some of the leading hypotheses.

  • A "false alarm" mechanism to reduce tension within groups?
  • A social bonding device? (e.g. a replacement for grooming in primates?)
Why do we age and die?
  • A group bonding mechanism?
  • A mating strategy?
  • Byproducts of the abilities to synchronise movements and notice subtle sounds?
  • A way to intimidate predators and induce an altered state of consciousness?
Why are humans instinctively monogamous?
Why do we find art attractive?
  • A side effect of adaptations which make us find bountiful landscapes and healthy humans aesthetically appealing?
  • As a status signal?
Why is there an instinct towards religion?
  • A byproduct of other traits such as being able to form theories of mind and causal narratives?
  • A group bonding mechanism which helped social hierarchies scale up to larger groups?
Why do we sleep and dream?
Why do fetishes exist?
  • Accidental cross-links between neighbouring areas in the human brain?
  • Skewed learning of sexually desirable features during childhood?
  • Standard mating strategies, simply amplified?
Why do women become infertile long before death (unlike almost all other mammals)?
  • The "grandmother hypothesis" that it's more effective to care for grandchildren than having more of your own?
  • So that they can be group leaders and repositories of knowledge?
Why does homosexuality exist?
  • Kin selection, with homosexuals better able to care for relatives' children?
  • Compensatory advantages of the relevant genes (e.g. making heterosexuals with those genes more attractive)?
  • The fact that historically, homosexuals have had children at reasonably high rates?
Are (low rates of) autism and depression evolutionarily favourable adaptions?
How did altruism evolve?
  • Mainly driven by kin selection?
  • As well as socially-enforced reciprocity?
How did life begin?
  • In tidal pools on volcanic islands?
  • In hydrothermal deep-sea vents?
  • Starting from RNA?
Those are all puzzles which hopefully will have a lot more light shed on them in the coming decades. Then there are the mysteries. I think of mysteries as big questions that we don't know how we could discover the answers to, even in principle. Before the theory of evolution, almost all of the questions above were such mysteries. Today, there are only a handful:

How did we evolve to use language?
What is consciousness?
Why did the universe begin?
Why does maths work?

Lastly, just to put you in the right frame of mind to cultivate curiosity, I want you to think about just how weird Earth is. Imagine if you'd grown up on a planet where the earth never randomly shook or poured out fire, where electricity and rocks and ice didn't shoot down from the sky, where water didn't form literally supersonic-speed waves, or float when frozen, or congeal into massive clumps in mid-air. Imagine a planet where the sun didn't just disappear from the mid-day sky at regular intervals, and where entire oceans didn't rise and fall by several metres every few hours. Imagine if your planet wasn't made up of enormous slabs of rock and molten metal crashing into each other. And then - then imagine you moved here. I bet you'd want to know why all these things happen. By that I don't just mean learning the technical mechanism, but also a deep explanation of the underlying reasons that it was this phenomenon and not another one. Does lightning occur in any sufficiently dense atmosphere? Is tectonic activity necessary to create conditions suitable for life? Or is it just a coincidence that both of these occur on our particular planet?

Is asking all these questions and learning all these explanations actually useful? Probably not. But think about how amazed our ancestors would have been that we're this close to figuring out answers to questions that seemed so intractable for so long. That sense of wonder, at least, is always worthwhile.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In Search of All Souls

I recently sat the All Souls Fellowship exam, called by some the " world's hardest exam ". It requires you to write twelve essays for four papers over two days; the breadth and novelty of the questions make it a fascinating experience. Two of the papers were "general papers" and two were in a humanities subject of your choice (in my case, philosophy); most papers had around 25 questions. I've summarised my answers below, as well as noting some of the other particularly interesting questions. General paper I: 1. How should you prepare for the end of the world? I started off with a somewhat emotional argument about the badness of death on an individual level. I referred to Epicurus' argument that we have nothing to fear from death because when we are dead, we will not have any preferences about it at all - but argued, in response, that having preferences about future states of the world is a foundation of our lives. In terms of the end of the ...
Read more

What have been the greatest intellectual achievements?

In yesterday's post I briefly mentioned Claude Shannon, founder of information theory. It occurred to me that even most Oxford students wouldn't know who he was, despite his work being crucial for the subsequent development of the "Information Age". How many other intellectual revolutions in obscure fields haven't become common knowledge yet? Perhaps the best way of finding out is just to start listing the greatest and most influential intellectual achievements ever, and seeing if anyone else has more to add - particularly in the humanities and social sciences, where my knowledge is a little shallower. Also, is there anything you expect to deserve a place on this list in the next few years? I'm focusing on achievements which either founded or greatly influenced an entire field (also, although there are many amazing artistic and engineering achievements, to keep things relatively concise I'm not going to include either here). Of course this will be necessa...
Read more

Moral strategies at different capability levels

Let’s consider three ways you can be altruistic towards another agent: You care about their welfare: some metric of how good their life is (as defined by you). I’ll call this care-morality - it endorses things like promoting their happiness, reducing their suffering, and hedonic utilitarian behavior (if you care about many agents). You care about their agency: their ability to achieve their goals (as defined by them). I’ll call this cooperation-morality - it endorses things like honesty, fairness, deontological behavior towards others, and some virtues (like honor). You care about obedience to them. I’ll call this deference-morality - it endorses things like loyalty, humility, and respect for authority. I think a lot of unresolved tensions in ethics comes from seeing these types of morality as in opposition to each other, when they’re actually complementary: Care-morality mainly makes sense as an attitude towards agents who are much less capable than you, and/or can't make decision...
Read more